Legal Opinion
Marshall, Amaya & Anton v. Arnold-Dobal
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 30, 2011No. 3D10-1939Published
1Opinion of the Court
76 So.3d 998 (2011)
MARSHALL, AMAYA & ANTON, etc., et al., Appellants,
v.
Karin ARNOLD-DOBAL, D.O., Appellee.
No. 3D10-1939.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 30, 2011.
Genovese Joblove & Battista, and Richard Sarafan, Miami, for appellants.
Robert H. Fernandez, for appellee.
Before RAMIREZ, LAGOA, and EMAS, JJ.
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying appellants Marshall, Amaya & Anton, etc., et al.'s, motion to compel arbitration based on an arbitration clause contained in an Employment Agreement, the validity and enforceability of which the appellants simultaneously…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Teledyne, Inc., Teledyne Canada Limited, and Teledyne Cm Products, Inc. v. Kone Corporation, Outokumpu Oy and Rammer Oy, Finnish CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Armas v. Prudential Securities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Murphy v. Courtesy Ford, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.