Legal Opinion

Caicedo v. Keeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered January 8, 2008, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

Defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law as they failed to make a prima facie showing that the condition complained of was not inherently dangerous (see Salomon v Prainito, 52 AD3d 803, 805 [2008]). An open and obvious hazard may negate the duty to warn, but it does not negate liability in negligence,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cupo v. KarfunkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Westbrook v. WR Activities-Cabrera MarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Salomon v. PrainitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Francis v. 107-145 West 135th Street Associates, Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Garcia v. Best Value Discount Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Leavy v. Key Food Stores Co-Operative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Leavy v. Key Food Stores Co-Operative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API