Legal Opinion

People v. Jenks

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Sessions of Tuolumne County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of the crime of grand larceny.

We deem it unnecessary to notice more than one of the errors assigned by counsel for the appellant. The other errors, if they are such, will doubtless be avoided upon another trial.

After five jurors had been impanelled, the Court informed defendant’s attorney “that he must exhaust all his challenges to the jury before accepting them, and that he would not be permitted to challenge afterward without assigning a sufficient reason therefor.” To the rule thus prescribed by the Court counsel for the…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ScogginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. State v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1868
  4. State v. PritchardNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Avila v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API