Legal Opinion

Kerr v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1901No. 12,022PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the district court for Phelps county. Tried below before Adams, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

The defendant in the court below was prosecuted for selling intoxicating liquors without having a license therefor as required by law. The information contained several counts of alleged different sales, on two of which he was convicted after a trial to the court and jury on a plea of not guilty. He was adjudged to pay a fine of $200 on one of the counts on which he was found guilty, and $100 on the other, and the costs of the prosecution. To secure a reversal of the judgment thus imposed he brings the case to this court by proceedings in error.

It is practically admitted that the defendant…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
  3. Hawk v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Darlington v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Cornell v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API