Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Primmer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of the account of 'an ■executor.

1Opinion of the Court

Heaton, S.

Two objections are made to the account of the ■executor on this judicial settlement. The executor is the son-in-law of the deceased and is the undertaker who buried her husband, about eight years before her death, and who buried her at her decease. He seeks to have allowed to him on this accounting the sum of fifty-one dollars, balance claimed to be due from the deceased to him for the burial of her husband, and $329.50 for her own funeral expenses.

Assuming that the proof is sufficient to show his employment by the deceased to bury her husband eight years and four months before her…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MeekNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920
  2. Estate of MalgorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. In re the Estate of GrassoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API