Legal Opinion

Murray v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Two appeals in one record from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Gorter, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The causes were argued together before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattison, Urner, Stockbridge and Adkins, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

There are two appeals in the record before us. Helen Murray, the appellee in the first of these appeals, filed her bill against the appellant George Wallace Murray on May the sixth, 1915, ashing for a divorce a Mensa et thoro and for the custody of their infant son at that time twenty-two months old. The defendant filed his answer thereto denying the allegations of the bill upon which the relief was sought, and issue was joined thereon.

The Court after hearing evidence upon the issue so framed passed its decree on September 28th, 1915, dismissing the bill, except as to the custody of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Thomas v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Garrett v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Simon v. SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  2. Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Simmont v. SimmontCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Sody v. SodyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API