Household Engineers Inc. v. Ryder
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract to recover the price of a radio, and for labor and materials. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the defendant without resting made a motion for a finding in his favor “on the ground that the plaintiff had not made out a prima facie case.” The record states that this “motion was denied and the defendant’s exception duly noted.” The proper procedure on the part of the trial judge would have been to decline to pass on the motion until the defendant rested. It is not clear from the record but that this was the reason on which the judge refused to grant the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Commonwealth v. McIntoshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Wild v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Hurley v. O'SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Todd v. MacLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gaw v. Hew Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Commonwealth v. BaderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Employment Security v. BartelsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1947
- Pisco v. RosatiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1938