Joseph J. Birkenstock and Generose M. Birkenstock v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioners-appellants, Joseph J. and Generóse M. Birkenstock, appeal from- the decision of the United States Tax Court rejecting their contention that they are lawfully entitled to reduce their gross income to its alleged'gold value for purposes of reporting their taxable income and finding them liable for a deficiency in income tax of $8,220.60 for the taxable year 1974. We affirm.
I
The ease was submitted to the Tax Court upon a Stipulation of Facts. According to the stipulation, the taxpayers, husband and wife, filed a joint federal income tax return for the year 1974. On this return, they…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Jerome DalyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Marvin Morris WangrudCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. RifenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. John Noehl SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Donald H. Mathes and Patricia Marie Mathes v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In the Matter of Joseph J. Birkenstock and Generose M. Birkenstock, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Nixon v. PhillipoffDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
- Nixon v. Individual Head of St. Joseph Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
- Louis J. Zuger v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Nordtvedt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.