Legal Opinion

Toler v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 28, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

•Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. Jesse C. Sheppard, Judge. Plaintiffs plead that they are “owners in fee” of the 160 acres of land in controversy; and but for the answer this would be an action at law. But the answer pleads an equitable defense, to-wit, laches and estoppel, and therefore converts this action into a suit in equity. Actions under section 650 are either legal or equitable, depending upon the issues raised by the pleadings.

Read the full summary

•Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. Jesse C. Sheppard, Judge. Plaintiffs plead that they are “owners in fee” of the 160 acres of land in controversy; and but for the answer this would be an action at law. But the answer pleads an equitable defense, to-wit, laches and estoppel, and therefore converts this action into a suit in equity. Actions under section 650 are either legal or equitable, depending upon the issues raised by the pleadings. Minor v. Burton, 228 Mo. 563; Nelson v. Jones, 245 Mo. 579; Hayes v. Shaw, 229 Mo. 124; Lee v. Conran, 213 Mo. 404. In cases of equity the Supreme…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

BOND, J..

Quieting Title: Equitable Defense. (after stating the facts as above):—I. Preliminary to a review of this case, we will dispose of the contention of the learned counsel for appellant, that this action, though strictly one at law in its inception, was transformed into a suit in equity by the inclusion in the

answer of the defense of laches and estop-pel.

As has been seen, four defenses were interposed in the answer. The record shows that each one of them, including the one resting on laches and estop-pel, concluded in the following terms: and defendant “again prays the court to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Graton v. Holliday-Klotz Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. Huff v. Laclede Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Gage v. CantwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. Shelton v. HorrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Riley v. O'KellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Williamson v. FrazeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. Clark Real Estate Co. v. Old Trails Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Travelers Insurance v. BeaglesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Ginaca v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API