Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2010No. ED 93883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Movant, Rasheed Muhammad, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for findings of fact and conclusions of law for one of movant’s claims.

Background

Movant was charged with murder in the second degree and armed criminal action. Movant pled guilty to the two crimes. The court sentenced movant to concurrent terms of twenty-five years’ imprisonment for each conviction.

Movant filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion. The motion court appointed counsel and an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Mitchell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Belcher v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Melton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Grimes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Muhammad v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Taylor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Ivan Mitchell v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API