Legal Opinion

Burtnett v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1932No. 638PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Burtnett and Keateh were charged by indictment containing four counts with violations of section 3, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 12).

The first count charged possession on February 15, 1930, the second charged a sale on that date, and the third charged a sale on March 15, 1930, at Wichita, Kansas, of substandard fluid extract of ginger containing more than one-half of one percent of alcohol by volume, intended and fit for beverag'e purposes. The proof showed that the sale charged in count three occurred on February 15, 1930, instead of the date…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Walker v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  3. State v. CrowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Henry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. LattimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John T. Dirring v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  2. United Cigar Whelan Stores Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API