Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mathis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 1972No. 71-1033Published

1DissentMager, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. From a reading *849of the cases cited by the majority as well as other applicable decisions it is my belief that the comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument cannot be construed as a comment upon the defendant’s failure to testify in his own behalf.

The decision in State v. Jones, Fla.1967, 204 So.2d 515, cited by the majority, readily points up the differing fact circumstances in those cases treating the question of comments by prosecutors on a defendant’s failure to testify and the importance of analyzing a prosecutor’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  2. Singleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Hand v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Luke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Adjmi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API