Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Butch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1979No. 190PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Park Irvine Butch contends, and the record reveals, that his sentence of “total confinement” was imposed without due consideration for this Commonwealth’s *32statutory sentencing guidelines.1 We therefore vacate judgment of sentence and remand for resentencing. See Commonwealth v. Kostka, 475 Pa. 85, 379 A.2d 884 (1977).

Appellant was convicted by a jury on May 29, 1975 of delivering marijuana (approximately one ounce) in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act.2 On March 5, 1976, the court sentenced him to serve a prison…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. KostkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. LoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. KnightonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BunterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API