Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Wilrock New York, Inc. & Tanenbaum Textile Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

Isidor Wasservogel,

Spec. Ref. Petitioner, a textile fabric importer, instituted an arbitration proceeding against respondent, a textile converter, pursuant to the provisions of an alleged contract between them. Upon respondent’s motion to stay these proceedings, a framed issue was referred to this court, to hear and determine, “ whether or not the alleged agreement, dated July 28, 1960, revised December 9, 1960, was made.”

The record establishes that one Martin Gross & Co. (hereinafter referred to as “ Gross ”), a textile broker, acted as agent for both parties here involved. Gross was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of HuxleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. In re the Arbitration between J. K. Knitting Mills, Inc. & DorginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API