Legal Opinion

Hardwick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 1996No. 95-01255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

677 So.2d 958 (1996)

Otis Lee HARDWICK, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-01255.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 31, 1996.

Richard Escobar, Tampa, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

The appellant, Otis Lee Hardwick, challenges the habitual violent felony offender sentence[1] imposed following his jury conviction for robbery with a firearm.[2] We agree with the appellant's argument that at sentencing the state failed to prove that he committed the robbery…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Stephenson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Mungin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landreth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Hardwick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Riser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API