Legal Opinion

Hammett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 2001No. 5D01-3478PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

804 So.2d 522 (2001)

Allen A. HAMMETT, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D01-3478.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 28, 2001.

Kurt Erlenbach, Titusville, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

GRIFFIN, J.

Appellant, Allen A. Hammett, appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief based on a claim of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel. We affirm for two reasons: first, ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel is not a cognizable claim. Waterhouse v. State, 792 So.2d 1176, 1193 (Fla. 2001); State v. Riechmann, 777…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RiechmannSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Waterhouse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hammett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Snow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API