Legal Opinion

Carter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 23, 2013No. 5D12-3570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrfinger, J.

Croix Michael Carter appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of cannabis with intent to sell or deliver. Carter argues that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress because the State failed to prove that the police had reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We agree and reverse.

Orlando Police Officer Reinaldo Rivero, the only witness to testify at the suppression hearing, was on patrol with Officer Frank Sikos when they pulled over Carter’s vehicle. Officer Rivero testified that “we saw ... the vehicle c[o]me to a stop sign. It didn’t stop before…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Duval Utility Co. v. FLA. PUBLIC SERV. COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. JAN CARLOS VALERO v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. John L. Fuller, II v. Patricia S. Reed, W. Va. DMVWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API