Legal Opinion

Hollie v. Ludeman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2012No. Nos. 11-2843, 11-2845, 11-2847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs Shannon Hollie, Robert Kunshier, Alvin Lamm, and Allen Pyron, civilly committed detainees in the Minnesota Sex Offender Program, appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their civil-rights complaints in which they claimed that newly enacted policies regarding personal property and computer usage violated their constitutional rights. We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs leave to amend, as they did not file a motion to amend or a proposed amended complaint, see Clayton v. White Hall Sch. Dist., 778 F.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Betty Clayton v. White Hall School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Allan O. Moore, Sr. v. Stephen MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greene v. Osborne-LeivianDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  2. Jones v. HerianDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  3. Schlumpberger v. OsborneDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  4. Walton v. MyersDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API