Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 10, 1999No. 03-98-00481-CRPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK KIDD, Justice.

After hearing his pleas of guilty, a jury found appellant James Howard Sanders, II, guilty of robbery and aggravated robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 29.02, .03 (West 1994). The jury assessed punishment for these offenses at imprisonment for twenty years and sixty years respectively, together with a $10,000 fine in each cause. By a single point of error, appellant contends the district court erred by refusing to consider a juror’s affidavit attached to his amended motion for new trial. We will affirm.

Appellant filed motions and amended motions for new trial complaining…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Soliz v. Saenz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  3. Buentello v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Porter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  5. Mayo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hicks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Dunklin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  3. Brantley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  4. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API