Legal Opinion

Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Vance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1936No. 25155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. Construing the policy in the instant case either with or without the “agreement for' exchange” of such policy for a policy previously issued, which agreement was excluded from evidence under the Code of 1933, § 56-904, because it was not attached to the policy, the result would be the same. This is true, irrespective of whether or not the provisions of that section which made an “application for insurance” inadmissible as evidence, unless it is contained in or attached to the policy, are limited to “life-insurance policies issued upon the lives of persons within this State,” and have no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Ogletree v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Perkins v. Empire Life-InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. State Life Insurance v. TylerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. American Indemnity Company v. DavisDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1957
  3. Nichols v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. New York Life Insurance v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. United National Insurance v. CodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API