Caesar v. Krow
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pawnee County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by Kate Caesar and' another againsit A. D. Krow and another. Demurrer to 'petition sustained, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.
This proceeding in'error was commenced to review tbe judgment of the district court of Pawnee oounty, Olcla., sustaining a demurrer to the petition of Kate Caesar and Tom Morgan, plaintiffs in said court and plaintiffs in error here, against A. D. Know and I. K. Berry, defendants below, defendants in error here, for the recovery of the 'possession of two certain tracts iorf land in said county, being the allotments of Agnes Akin Smith and Simond Smith, respectively, who were full-blood members of the Pawnee Tribe or Band of Indians. The parties will hereinafter be designated as they appeared…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- McKay v. KalytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Hy-Yu-Tse-Mil-Kin v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lane v. United States Ex Rel. MickadietSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Kalyton v. KalytonOregon Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gray v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. HuserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- McDougal v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Arenas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
- Spicer v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.