Legal Opinion

In Re Ballard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 8, 2006No. S06Y0638, S06Y0639, S06Y0640, S06Y0641, S06Y0642, S06Y0643PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

These six disciplinary matters are before the Court on the Notices of Discipline filed by the State Bar against Respondent Steven H. Ballard in which it alleged that Ballard violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), 1.16, 3.2, 4.1, and 8.4 (a) (4) of Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Ballard acknowledged service of the notices pursuant to Bar Rule 4-203.1 (b) (1), but filed his Notice of Rejection outside the 30-day period provided for in Bar Rule 4-208.3. Accordingly, Ballard is in default, has no right to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to the discipline of this Court, see Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re BallardSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re BallewSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. in the Matter of Shannon Briley-HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  3. In re Briley-HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  4. In Re BallewSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API