Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 2, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marble; J.

By the terms of the statute any structure which is erected or continued upon or over any highway is deemed a public nuisance. The word “highway ” comprehends every public thoroughfare, whether road or sidewalk (Hall v. Manchester, 40 N. H. 410, 415), with its soil and all the space above it. State v. Kean, 69 N. H. 122; Woodsville Fire District v. Stahl, 80 N. H. 502, 504; Exeter v. Meras, 80 N. H. 132.

The object of the statute is the preservation of the public right. State v. Kean, supra. It forbids incumbrances and encroachments, but does not attempt to regulate viatic or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Munroe v. DeerfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  4. Felts v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API