Legal Opinion

Oneida National Bank & Trust Co. v. Kranz

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. The plaintiff alleges that the mortgage payments are substantially in arrears. The defendants allege that the mortgage payments are and always have been current.

The defendant Merwin F. Kranz and one Albert L. Kranz as mortgagors executed this mortgage to Walter A. Sahl, Sr., mortgagee, on January 21, 1953. The principal amount was $10,000 with interest at 5% per annum and it called for monthly payments of $66 applicable first to interest and then to principal. From the beginning the property was the residence of the defendant Merwin F. Kranz and his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hobart v. . HobartNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Bean v. . TonneleNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Macaulay v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Newcombe v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Redmond v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krawitt v. KeyBankNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Elizabeth June English v. Regions BankCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  3. Elizabeth June English v. Regions BankCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API