Legal Opinion
Callahan v. Poppell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 26, 2006No. 06-6090PublishedCited by 175 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
David Callahan, an Oklahoma prisoner appearing pro se, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants’ failure to provide him with a wheelchair following an injury violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. The district court granted the defendants’ motions for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Leon Snipes v. George Detella, Doctor Ehrhardt, John L. RussianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Green v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Dulany v. CarnahanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Martinez v. BeggsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Quintana v. Santa Fe County Board of Comm.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Wishneski v. AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Snell v. NevilleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.