Legal Opinion

Langley v. Godwin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1924No. 7180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

This suit was instituted by plaintiffs in error against defendants in error, to recover an alleged indebtedness due each of them by Joe S. Godwin, arising out of the sale of the partnership interest of W. G. Langley in the Franklin Motor Car Company of Fort Worth, Tex., to Joe S. Godwin, and the assumption by Godwin of Langley’s share of the indebtedness then outstanding against the Franklin Motor Car Company. Included-in this indebtedness was an obligation of the Franklin Motor Car Company to pay certain rents to M. L. Eppstein which the Franklin Motor Car Company was unable to pay on.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Brazee v. WoodsTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Price v. Horton & MaltsbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Langley v. GodwinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API