Legal Opinion

L. B. Foster Co. v. Fox

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 14, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff contracted to sell to defendants 750 size “ A ” Reading Rerailers. Deliveries were in installments; two installments were accepted and paid for. Defendants refused to specify deliveries for the third installment and plaintiff, claiming that there was no market, sold the implements as junk.

The burden, therefore, rested upon plaintiff to prove that the articles which it so resold complied with the description of the contract. (Chemung Iron & Steel Co. v. Smith & Hemenway, Inc., 203 App Div. 624.) There was no proof to this effect in plaintiff’s case in chief, for plaintiff’s witness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cahen v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Chemung Iron & Steel Co. v. Smith & Hemenway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bastian Bros. v. Regal Doll Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  2. L. B. Foster Co. v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API