Legal Opinion

Smith v. Locklear

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 29, 2005No. 5D04-3669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s determination that the purported agreement between Lois Locklear Smith and her brother, James Early Locklear, Sr., is unenforceable. The agreement lacks consideration. Providing past services rendered without the expectation of compensation is not adequate consideration to support a contract. See Fla. Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. v. Brown, 47 So.2d 748, 760 (Fla.1949). Alternatively, an agreement to make a gift is not enforceable against the donor. Brown v. Brown, 501 So.2d 24, 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Consequently, “[t]he promisor may change his mind at will and is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strong & Trowbridge Co. v. H. Baars & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. Florida Nat. Bank Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. Brown v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. GOLLOBITH v. FerrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API