Legal Opinion

Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 1993No. 91-36017PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND DISSENT

In his petition for rehearing, Jeffries again asserts a due process violation in his state trial because of juror misconduct. We reviewed the district court’s treatment of the question initially as an attempt by two jurors to impeach their verdicts by affidavits reciting misconduct in the jury room. The affidavits alleged that a juror had said, during deliberation on the guilt phase of the trial, “Jeffries is a convicted armed robber.”

We agreed with the district court that if, indeed, the alleged misconduct had occurred, the misconduct probably had no influence on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donald Dickson v. G.E. Sullivan, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Fikri Bayramoglu v. W. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Patrick James Jeffries v. James Blodgett, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cook v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API