Porter v. . Purdy
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The attention of the learned judges by whom this case was decided in the court below, could not have been called to the case of Van Steenbergh v. Bigelow, (3 Wend. 42), or they would not have reversed the judgment of the county court. The case is directly in point, and decides the very question on which the learned judges reversed the judgment. In that case the plaintiff sued the defendant, who was agent of the Bristol Turnpike Company, in trespass, for laying the road of that company over his land without having acquired, as he (the plaintiff) insisted, the right so to do. The defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Savacool v. BoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Van Steenbergh v. BigelowNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- People ex rel. Ottman v. Commissioners of Highways of SewardNew York Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by31 opinions
- English v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- McEneney v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Lingo v. BurfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Leonard v. SparksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- O'Connor v. . HugginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.