Legal Opinion

Ikner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1992No. CR 90-1723PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woodrow Ikner, the appellant, was convicted of perjury in the first degree. His sentence of five years' imprisonment was "split," with one year to be served in the county jail and four years on supervised probation. Although the appellant raises four issues on this appeal from that conviction, we need address only one.

This Court agrees with the argument of the appellant that his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted because the prosecution failed to prove that the false statement was material to the proceeding in which it was made.

The crime of perjury in the first degree…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Patrick J. Cunningham, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and John J. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Martin Joseph Damato, A/K/A Sal PiconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ZimlichSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Fort v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. McDonald v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  4. Ikner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. McDonald v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API