Wallace v. Ryan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — HoN. W. F. Be ANNAN, Judge. Action at law to recover for tbe use of a horse. The defendant demurred to' the petition, and thé demurrer was overruled, and defendant refusing to plead further, the court rendered judgment against defendant, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
The petition, which we set out in full, was as follows: “Plaintiff respectfully represents and shows to this court that on or about the 13th day of May, 1891, the defendant, James Ryan, agreed to pay *116this plaintiff for the use of his brown mare, Lady W., to be bred to the defendant’s stallion, Riando Wilkes, the sum of one hundred and twenty-five dollars, as more fully appears from the following written contract .entered into by the.parties hereto, to-wit: Wilton, Iowa, May 13, 1891. We here agree to the follow: James Ryan promised the sum of $125 dollars for use of Lady W., by Rendeston,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Palmer v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Thompson v. LockeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Shuler v. DuttonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Bigelow v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daily ex rel. Daily v. MinnickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Aultman v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Dunn v. Dunn TrustSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Rapp v. H. Linebarger & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Work v. Central National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.