Legal Opinion

Rusk County v. Maloney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1931No. 3962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We are called upon to chiefly determine the point, broadly stated, of whether or not the county was entitled to have recovery for the amount of excess or delinquent tax fees in suit. Upon the evidence, the trial court made the affirmative finding of fact that the commissioners' court contracted with Mr. L. T. Standard to assist the tax collector in the collection of delinquent taxes. There is necessarily involved in the further findings of the court the facts that Mr. Standard performed the services, not for the tax collector as his deputy tax collector, but apart therefrom and in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gano v. Palo Pinto CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Von Rosenberg v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Ewing v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Flowers v. Logan CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Clark v. Logan CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coffee v. LiebCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. White v. McGillTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bexar County v. North East Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  4. Slimp v. Wise CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Loard v. ComoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API