Morris v. Zinn

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff recovered a verdict for personal injuries, judgment was entered in his favor and defendant has appealed; the latter states but one question involved and this concerns only the amount of the verdict, which he alleges to be excessive. In overruling this contention, the court below well said: “Plaintiff, 57 years of age, had for twenty years been steadily engaged as a hod-carrier. The upper bone in [his] right arm was fractured near the shoulder. A joint has been destroyed, a shortening of the bone of the arm has resulted, and a permanent injury has followed, so that, as was…