Legal Opinion

Livingston v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 30, 1935No. 14193PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Eishburne.

The plaintiff brought this action in the County Court for Orangeburg County, against the State Highway Department for damages alleged to have been sustained by him on August 14, 1933, under the allegation that while crossing state highway No. 3, at a point north of Edisto River, he stepped into a hole on the highway containing broken glass, and as a result his right foot, ankle and leg were permanently injured. •

The defendant’s answer was a general denial.

The cause was tried before the County Judge and a jury, and resulted in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Morris, Adm'r. v. Langley MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Steverson v. Orangeburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bunton v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. Floyd v. Town of Lake CitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Crosby v. City of ChesterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. Chilton v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  5. Fleischer Knitting Mills Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API