Mordkoff v. State

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for post conviction relief, and from the trial court’s order that fifty percent of his gain-time be forfeited. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part; reverse in part; and remand.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion for post conviction relief, as the motion was successive and raised issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in his previous 3.850 motions. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986); Williams v. State, 557 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

However, the trial court erred in ordering that…