Legal Opinion

People v. Montano

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1966No. Crim. 10968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaus, J.

The sole question on this appeal from a conviction for possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530) is whether the trial judge should have ordered the disclosure of the names of two confidential informants. The search warrant which led to the discovery of the contraband in defendant’s home and garage was issued on the basis of the information supplied by the two individuals to a deputy sheriff.

After the information against defendant was filed in the superior court, he made a pretrial motion in that court for the discovery of the names of the two informants. He supported his motion…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API