Legal Opinion

State v. Crumitie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 2019No. COA18-781PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*374 Where an identification by a law enforcement officer was not subject to the Eyewitness Identification Reform Act, we affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress. Where defendant was given an opportunity to cross-examine testifying expert witness about another expert's report, the trial court did not err in allowing the testimony into evidence.

In the early evening of 5 August 2016, defendant Timothy Lavaun Crumitie went to the apartment complex of his ex-girlfriend, Kimberly Cherry, and shot her boyfriend, Michael Gretsinger, twice in the head. Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. Ortiz-ZapeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  2. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  3. State v. PabonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  4. State v. PabonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API