Legal Opinion

MacKie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1968No. Docket 3,807PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. G-illis, J.

On or about January 1, 1949, plaintiff and defendants entered into an employment agreement whereby plaintiff was appointed to represent defendants as a local agent. Plaintiff’s employment terminated on October 16, 1961. The question before this Court is whether plaintiff was, under the agreement, entitled to receive certain special benefits when his employment terminated. The amount of these benefits is not in issue.

*558Tbe provisions of tbe employment agreement wbicb give rise to the dispute between tbe parties are set out below.* Plaintiff agrees that be bas not met tbe latter condition of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DempsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Knox v. KnoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. MacDonald v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Rochester Corporation v. W. L. Rochester, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  2. 1st American Systems, Inc. v. RezattoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Couch v. Administrative Committee of Difco Laboratories Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Johnson v. Country Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Hudson v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API