Legal Opinion

Howard S. Wright Construction Co. v. Laborers International Union of North America, Local Union No. 169

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 2009No. 07-16446Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Plaintiff-Appellant Howard S. Wright Construction Company (Wright) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its action against the Laborer’s International Union of North America, Local Union No. 169 (Union). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.1

Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not supply them here *555except as necessary to explain our decision. We review a district court’s legal conclusion that Plaintiffs repudiation of the agreement was not valid de novo. Laborers Health and Welfare for Northern California v. Westlake Development, 53…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jennifer C. Turpen Donald Lee Thomas v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California Laborers Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California Laborers Training and Retraining Trust Fund for Northern California v. Westlake Development, a Corporation First Doe Second Doe Third Doe Black Corporation White Corporation Blue Co. And Grey Company, a Corporation, Westlake Development Company, Inc., Petitioner-Counter-Respondent-Appellee v. Local 389 Laborers Union Northern California District Council of Laborers, Respondents-Counter-Petitioners-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API