Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 1998-1503PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 52.] THE STATE EX REL. BOOHER, APPELLANT, v. HONDA OF AMERICA MANUFACTURING, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc.,

2000-Ohio-269.] Civil procedure—Workers’ compensation—Civ.R. 53(E)(3), applied—Court of appeals’ denial of writ of mandamus affirmed. (No. 98-1503—Submitted January 26, 2000—Decided February 23, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD12-1666. __________________ {¶ 1} In 1990, appellant-claimant, Ramona D. Booher, was employed by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Booher v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gevedon v. GevedonOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Target Auto Repair v. Morales (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Curry v. BettisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Wajda v. M&J Automotive, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. KarabinosOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API