Bright v. Central City Street Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Amendment. Debtor and creditor. Promissory note. Before Judge Miller. Bibb superior court. November adjourned term, 1890. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
Upon tbe petition of Blair et al. in behalf of themselves and such other creditors as might be made parties, the property of the Central City Street Railroad *536Company was placed in the hands of a temporary receiver. Bright was made a party to the case on his own petition in the nature of an intervention, in which he alleged that the defendant was indebted to him upon a promissory note, the consideration of which as recited therein was “value received as commission on loan” to defendant. This note was executed and delivered to Bright after the appointment of the receiver, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Akin v. OrdinarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Hardee v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Kennedy & Morrow v. VandiverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Lewis v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Talbotton Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Bartow Guano Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Camp & Camp v. Interstate Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916