Legal Opinion

Serber v. McLaughlin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 21, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, on quantum meruit. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Silas Cook, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington

Counsel for appellee in their brief present the reason for appellee’s not fulfilling his contract, substantially as follows :

“ The main facts are an agreement by defendant to pay plaintiff $480 for furnishing material and labor, and plastering certain premises. This was a verbal agreement, made in October, 1899. McLaughlin got ready to do the job, saw the wholesale and retail men, purchased some one bundred and thirty-five bushels of lime, the hair, and com■pleted his contract Avith the lumbermen for the lath; also had his horses and scaffolding, hauled some eight loads on the premises, lime…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Walker v. TuckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Ford v. McVayIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Illingsworth v. SlossonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  5. Rockwell v. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northwestern Military & Naval Academy v. WadleighAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  2. Platt v. FischerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API