Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Queen

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1994No. 921-92Published

1DissentBaird, Judge

On original submission, a majority of this Court held the sufficiency of the evidence may not be challenged by pretrial writ of habeas corpus following the granting of a motion for a new trial on non-sufficiency grounds. Ex parte Queen, 877 S.W.2d 752 (Tex.Cr.App.1994). Accordingly, appellant’s retrial was not jeopardy barred regardless of the sufficiency of the evidence at his first trial. Id., 877 S.W.2d at 754, 755. Because the opinion on original submission was based on Lofton v. State, 777 S.W.2d 96 (Tex.Cr.App.1989), a case I believe to have been wrongly decided, I respectfully dissent…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API