Legal Opinion

Harshman v. Harshman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1941No. 470PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*634OPINION

By BARNES, J.

' The above-entitled cause is now being-determined as an error proceeding by reason of plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Greene County, Ohio.

The trial court sustained a general demurrer to plaintiff’s petition and dismissed her action on the ground that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action. Naturally this becomes the sole and only question for our determintion on plaintiff’s appeal.

Plaintiff’s petition named as defendants' herself, as executrix, and John B. Harshman, as executor, of the last will and testament of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nettleton v. Ramsey County Land & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. KangahOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Fifth Third Bank v. Lorance, Ca2006-10-280 (8-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. SMS Fin. XXVI, L.L.C. v. Waxman Chabad Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API