Legal Opinion

Martin v. National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1976No. 30943Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ingram, Justice.

This appeal, from the denial of an interlocutory injunction, involves an infant’s contract of suretyship which she sought to disaffirm with the appellee bank. The question for decision is whether this contract is voidable under the provisions of Code Ann. § 20-201, or whether it is enforceable. The trial court apparently was of the opinion that the contract was not voidable and therefore declined to enjoin the appellee from enforcing it. We reverse that judgment.

The evidence at the interlocutory hearing shows that appellant was 15 years old when her father gave her the money…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burns v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  2. Holbrook v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API