Pictorial Review Co. v. Gerald Fitz Gibbon & Son
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Woodbury District Court. — Hon. Wm. Hutchinson, Judge. Action at law to recover for goods alleged to have been sold to the defendants. On trial to a jury there was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $60. On the theory that such recovery is inadequate, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Weaver, J.-
The petition, which was filed March 10,1910, sets out an alleged written contract with the defendants, whereby defendants ordered and agreed to pay for certain “fashion sheets” to be delivered in monthly parts, or in installments covering a period of five years unless sooner revoked upon giving a stipulated notice. Plaintiff says that upon the terms of said writing it sold and delivered to defendants goods to the amount of $98.74, and that said sum of $98.74, with interest thereon from November 30, 1909, is due and unpaid. The demand for judgment is in the following form:…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Providence Jewelry Co. v. S. Fessler & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. CrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Lamasters v. SpringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- Commercial Jewelry Co. v. BraczykCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Good Roads Machinery Co. v. OttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Robinson v. MainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.