Legal Opinion

Yeiser v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1822PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the court of the sixth district.

1Opinion of the CourtPorter, J.

The appellant, who was defendant in *293the court below, having failed to prosecute his appeal within one month, as prescribed by the act of the legislature, passed the 1st March, 1822, the record has been brought up by the appellee, who has prayed that the judgment of the inferior court should be affirmed with damages.

The only difficulty in acceding to the prayer of the appellee, is the manner in which the record is made up. There is neither statement of facts, special verdict, evidence taken down by the clerk, written document certified, or any thing equivalent thereto; and the question is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Breedlove v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1821
  2. De Armas' CaseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1821
  3. Langlish v. SchonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1818

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. ChappellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Hiestand v. ForsythSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API