Legal Opinion

Holt v. Dollarhide

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from, Hickory County Circuit Court. cited Sinclair vs. Bradley, 52 Mo., 180 ; Flanagan vs. Hutchinson, 47 Mo., 237; Howard vs. Coshow, 33 Mo., 118; Besshears vs. Rowe, 46 Mo., 501; 3 Pars. Cont., 23, 24; Nelson vs. Boynton, 3 Met., 396.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

The judgment was for the plaintiff below, and the only point made in this court for a reversal is that the agreement on which the action was brought, was within the statute of frauds, and was not evidenced by any note or memorandum in writing. The case shows that Rice executed and delivered to McCloud, a bond for the payment of a certain sum of money, and that McCloud assigned and delivered the same to the plaintiff, Holt; that Rice sold to the defendant, Dollarhide, a lot of land for which defendant agreed to pay a stipulated amount; that Rice, at the time of the sale of the land, was owing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Besshears v. RoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Sinclair v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schufeldt v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Walther v. MerrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Beardslee v. MorgnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Keithley v. PitmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Wilson v. VassMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API