Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Holt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: “Time and again v/e have held that conditional orders of preclusion for failure to serve a bill of particulars may not be disregarded with impunity, and that in the absence of extraordinary and exceptional circumstances it is an abuse of discretion by Special Term to grant relief from such an order” (Le Frois Foods Corp. v Aetna Ins. Co., 47 AD2d 994). The instant case presents a model of the abuse warned against. The accident occurred June-1, 1976; summons and complaint were served April 28, 1978;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Solomon v. Travelers Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Le Frois Foods Corp. v. Policy Advancing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hatch v. St. Joseph's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Draper v. ZamiaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API